Food and Diet - the Splenda section Splenda Mini-Site - another division of FoodandDiet

Home Page
Story Index
Submit Story
Symptom List
Helpful Links
Go to Food & Diet

Welcome to the Food and Diet Splenda Mini-Site. After receiving more than 300 stories from Splenda lovers and those suffering the ill effects of Splenda consumption, we decided it was time to create a new area just for Splenda. This mini-site contains stories received after 15 April 2005, as well as the links, basic information, and an expanded list of symptoms. If you want to read stories we received before 15 April 2005, please visit the main website.

Let's talk about Splenda...

In response to the studies about the dangers of saccharin and, more recently, aspartame (NutraSweet, Equal), along came Splenda. Splenda is the marketing name for sucralose.

Sucralose is a chlorinated sucrose derivative used as an artificial sweetener. It is sold in packets and in bulk for home use under the tradename Splenda, and is used in thousands of products. It's everywhere and, according to reports from our visitors, so are the problems arising from its use.

The problem with sucralose, as it was with aspartame, is that it was rushed through the FDA approval processes without thorough, long-term testing by independent laboratories or groups to prove or disprove its potential health hazards. The information is only now being considered by independent organizations and watch groups.

Splenda, the tradename seen in stores on packaging, is a combination of three ingredients--sucralose, dextrose, and maltodextrin. Dextrose is a sweetener. Maltodextrin is a solids builder and drying agent. Neither dextrose nor maltodextrin is known to have any side effects, except for some allergic reactions in persons with allergies to corn or wheat as they are the building blocks for these two ingredients. People with allergies to corn or wheat are encouraged to speak with their physicians concerning intake of maltodextrin or dextrose.

We had previously cited information found in the 23 November 1991 article in the New Scientist. We had removed the information when we could not locate the article to confirm our information. Well, we found it.

Although the article points out that no conclusive studies have been done concerning negative effects of sucralose, the following comment from the close of the article is important to note: "The committee and the CSPI also want more data on the mutagenic properties of 1,6-dichlorofructose, a breakdown product of sucralose. Trace amounts of 1,6-dichlorofructose are sometimes found in canned drinks left to stand for several months. John Howlett, the secretary of the SCF, says: 'If they (Tate & Lyle) wanted to get the committee to give its endorsement, they should answer those issues.' "

According to the Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory in Oxford, England, "mutagenic" is defined thusly: "A mutagenic agent is one which is capable of causing mutations. It may also (but does not necessarily) act as a carcinogen."

A thorough discussion with your physician is in order if you believe you are suffering ill effects from the use of sucralose or related products.

While some claims link saccharin with cancer, if you must use an artificial sweetener, it is best to use saccharin. We also encourage you to learn more about stevia, rice sirup, and other natural sugar alternatives.

We believe it is still best to stick with sugar for sweetening. Just remember to count the calories. Try using a bit less each time until you lower your intake in coffees, teas, and other sweetened drinks. You'll find that you can probably live with half the sugar once you adjust to it. Besides, the sweeter the drink is, the less thirst quenching it is!

.
Splenda Chat

Coming soon... a Splenda chatroom where you discuss the benefits and drawbacks of sucralose consumption with other Splenda users.



powered by FreeFind
Site designed and maintained by webDedication webDesign Studios
© 2002-2007 webDedication webDesign Studios and Cherie Yannone.
All rights reserved